MRI differences from an X-ray or CT

How MRIs are very different than X-Rays.

The biggest difference between an MRI and X-ray is in the manner in which the image is produced. There are no ionizing radiation (the fancy term for X-rays) involved in producing an MRI scan. Instead, MRIs use a strong magnetic field and pulses of radio waves to make images of structures inside the body. So in the broadest or biggest sense, an MRI scan prevents a person from any exposure to X-Rays or any other forms of radiation.

However, that causes another big difference between them both. An MRI may take anywhere from 30 to 60 minutes or more to capture the images. Sometimes even a couple hours in certain circumstances. An X-Ray, however, is somewhat instant compared. Most xrays take around the same time as snapping a picture with your phone or camera. So you could see why in cases such as an emergency, an xray might make more sense.

If a doctor is looking for the most complete information he can get from a test, there is one clear winner - an MRI. Not only can an MRI provide pictures from almost every angle, it can provide a 360 degree view. And, if finding out about a patient's blood vessels are part of the equation, the addition of a contrast given during an MRI can show blood flow and other blood vessel data that no other test can provide, including an xray.

MRIs are very good at identifying legament tears and joint effusions in knee of shoulder injuries. They are also preferred often in the imaging of the spine since both the bones and the spinal cord itself can be evaluated.An MRI can also frequently detect a bone bruise when no crack is visible or hard to see on an X-ray.

Here are two examples to compare:

ABOVE: XRAY of Cervical Spine and Neck.

ABOVE: MRA of blood vessels in neck.